Skip to content
The Orange Cloud Report

Storage

Queues review

Score: 6/10

Fine for background jobs; not yet a serious message bus.

Reliability
5Pricing honesty
8Developer experience
7Trajectory
6

The breakdown explains the score. It is not an average. How to read these.

Last updated

Queues gives Workers a native way to decouple work. Producers push messages and consumers process them in batches, with automatic retries and dead-letter queues. It is pleasant and cheap for “do this expensive thing later,” and exposing a queue as another binding feels right.

Its limitations set a low ceiling. Per-queue throughput caps push you towards sharding, there is no FIFO ordering, and at-least-once delivery leaves duplicate handling to you. It also runs on Durable Objects, which does not reassure me about tail latency or availability.

It’s a happy fit for webhooks, notifications, and background processing where a delayed or duplicate message is harmless. I would not put it at the center of an event-driven architecture yet.

Status page incidents

Cloudflare's own record, published under Queues.

Compare with other products →
Last 11 months
4
Major or critical
0
Median time open
0.3 h
Since October 2025
7

Counts what Cloudflare published, not what broke: time open is how long the status entry stayed open, and nothing before October 2025 is tracked at all. Incidents Cloudflare tagged against nothing but named in the title are counted too. The caveats in full.

Consider instead

  • Workflows

    Use Workflows when the job has multiple durable steps and needs explicit state.

  • Hyperdrive

    Persist business state in a database behind Hyperdrive; let Queues carry the work.

Decision guides